The Large Courtroom held that the fit for permanent injunction was maintainable as there was an apprehended danger towards the plaintiff’s possession of the land. Summary: In such cases, the appellants submitted a match for possession and permanent injunction. The court uncovered that the fit filed with the respondents was https://hire-sale-deeds-lawyer-ne01429.wizzardsblog.com/32506933/how-much-you-need-to-expect-you-ll-pay-for-a-good-hire-cancellation-of-documents-advocate-near-me-karachi